Search History
Clear History
{{item.search_key}}
Hot Searches
Change
{{item.name}}
{{item.english_name}}
Subscribe eNews
Once A Week Once Every Two Weeks
{{sum}}
Login Register

Applications

Trinseo launches all-acrylic latex binder for flexible flooring adhesives

Beaulieu Fibres supports CO2 footprint calculations for PP fibres in automotive parts

Simoldes Plastics and ELIX Polymers cooperate on recycled materials for automotive interior

Products

Arburg: Plastic is simply indispensable as a material

Rönesans invests US$2 billion PP production plant and terminal facility in Turkey

Arkema, AkzoNobel and Omya develop sustainable decorative paints with lower carbon footprint

Activities

  • Round Table at Fakuma 2023: “Plastic – Recyclable Rather Than Problem Material!”

  • ArabPlast 2023 – The Success Journey Continues………..

  • GREAT NEWS! INAPA 2023 IS COMING BACK 24 - 26 May 2023 at JIExpo Jakarta, Indonesia

Pictorial

Industry Topic

ASEAN: The Next Manufacturing Hub

Innovative and Sustainable Packaging

Green Plastics: News & Insights

CHINAPLAS

CHINAPLAS 2025 Focus

CHINAPLAS 2024 Focus

CHINAPLAS 2023 Focus

Exhibition Topic

CHINA INSIGHT

Fakuma 2024 Highlights

K 2022 FOCUS

News Videos

CHINAPLAS 2025: Bioplastics bloom in wide applications

Pengqiang: Exploring smart feature & core advantages of liquid energy-saving AC systems

CHINAPLAS 2025: Smart technologies drives new quality productive forces

Conference Videos

【Mandarin session:Webinar playback】Covestro: Next-generation flame-retardant medical polycarbonate solutions for housing applications

【Mandarin session:Webinar playback】Covestro: RE Material Solutions: Empowering electronics industry to fulfill new EPEAT standards and lower carbon footpint

【Mandarin session:Webinar playback】Covestro: Covestro's CMF Trends 2025+: Electronics, Automotive and Healthcare

Corporate/Product Videos

Jiangsu Liside New Material Co., Ltd.

Dow 45 years in China

Carbon Removal and Carbon Emission Reduction Tech Solution——Yuanchu Technology (Beijing) Co. Ltd.

Exhibition

Playback TECHHUB 2025@CPRJ Live Streaming for CHINAPLAS

Playback TECHHUB@CPRJ Live Streaming for CHINAPLAS

Events

Playback On April 14, the "6th Edition CHINAPLAS x CPRJ Plastics Recycling and Circular Economy Conference and Showcase" at the Crowne Plaza Shenzhen Nanshan is currently being livestreamed!

Playback 5th Edition CHINAPLAS x CPRJ Plastics Recycling and Circular Economy Conference and Showcase

Home > News > Recycling

Plastics supply chain in Europe presses for legal certainty for recycled content

Source:Adsale Plastics Network Date :2023-04-13 Editor :Nigel Davis
Copyright: 原创,请勿转载

Plastics supply chain in Europe continues to push for greater legal certainty for recycled content, therefore, tracking of recycled content is a major issue, according to Nigel Davis, Insight Editor at ICIS.

 

There is obvious urgency behind the recent meeting of 31 trade associations for the EU to be clear on how it legally views chemical recycling and how recycled content is tracked in plastic products. It is the tracking of recycled content that is a major issue with industry pressing for the legal acknowledgement of a mass balance approach that excludes fuel use.

 

“Mass balance is a transparent and auditable method to trace a defined material characteristic along the value-chain from material suppliers to consumers,” the trade associations, which represent chemical producers, plastics converters, recyclers and end-use industries, claim.

 

“A mass balance chain of custody is already used and accepted in other domains such as sustainable forestry products and fair-trade cocoa and chocolate,” they said.

 

Essentially, this is push for policy support from the European Commission and EU member states for chemical recycling that could help speed investment and add more overall plastic recycling capability.

 

“The rules currently being developed for the Single-Use Plastics Directive (SUPD) implementing act will have a key impact on both mechanical and chemical recycling investments in Europe,” the associations said.


1_web.jpg

Tracking of recycled content is a major issue especially with the industry pressing for the legal acknowledgement of a mass balance approach that excludes fuel use.


The timelines for targets set out in frameworks such as the proposed Packaging and Packaging Waste directive, which set out goals for chemical recycling capacity by 2030 and 2040, will require the sector to begin work on commercial-scale production facilities immediately, according to the associations.

 

“It is therefore key that policymakers set a precedent as to when and how a mass balance chain of custody in recycled plastics will be applied in the EU sooner rather than later,” the trade groups said. “This precedent should also set the direction of policy in non-packaging sectors such as automotive or construction, where recycled plastics targets are currently under discussion or may arise in the future.”

 

There are clear concerns over the mass balance approach to approximating the recycled content of individual plastic items and customer acceptance is critical. If recycling capacity is to grow however, and the move towards greater plastics circularity accelerated, then clearer policy support is required.

 

The industry view is that the mass balance model can be based on credible third-party verification and certification. Chemicals trade group Cefic says that process losses and outputs, consumed as energy, should not count towards the recycled content targets.

 

“We need all up- and down-stream levers to be deployed, including both mechanical and chemical recycling, to create a circular plastics economy,” continued Virginia Janssens, Plastics Europe Managing Director, noting that chemical recycling is the only avenue for reusing certain kinds of plastic waste and to reach quality levels needed for some end markets.

 

“However, the complexity of the European plastics system, and long-investment cycles, mean investment decisions taken now will determine what the industry looks like in 2050,” she said.

 

Janssens added, “To accelerate the growth of chemical recycling, investors need the confidence provided by a full recognition of chemical recycling and acceptance of the mass balance model by EU policy makers. The window of opportunity to make investment decisions is rapidly closing.”

 

According to Helen McGeough, senior analyst for plastic recycling at ICIS, the open letter is the latest call from the recycling value chain for greater legal certainty from regulators.

 

“The chain is set to invest or seek investment to expand capabilities which will ultimately improve supply of recycled materials and move higher volumes of plastic waste away from the lower echelons of the waste hierarchy and requires this certainty to support those investment decisions,” she said.

 

“The supply chain wants and needs to have clarity on how to prove recycled content, for reporting purposes both legally required and expected from consumers,” she continued.

 

At present, the sector lacks a standardized approach, according to McGeough, with the commonly-used methodology behind mass balance remaining contentious.

 

“The open letter suggests the use of mass balance for recycling, but it remains unclear from the letter whether the mass balance approach is suggestion application not only to chemical recycling, but to mechanical recycling as well where it is generally not adopted in the same way,” she stated.

 

In mechanical recycling mass balance can also refer to the process of using a credit system to substitute the use of recycled material in one end-use for another in order to meet sustainability targets, according to McGeough.

 

“This can generate criticism for failing to fundamentally encourage tangible growth in recycling, increasing claims of greenwashing by the sector,” she said.

 

The concept of greenwashing is coming under increasing scrutiny in the EU, with regulators this week announcing a stronger push on eliminating the practice as deadlines to reach certain thresholds for recycling and carbon abatement draw closer.

 

At present, many of the systems for quantifying decarburization and waste-reduction remain fragmented, with McKinsey noting that the environmental, social and governance (ESG) space is currently similar to the state financial reporting was in a century ago.

 

Systems are likely to become more standardized over time, but the complexity of chemical – and even mechanical – makes the process a complex one, with few easy answers.

 

“Although harmonization in the recycling sector is needed in many areas, in terms of standardizing recycled content measurement this is challenging to resolve by a one size fits all approach for a complex industry, where the routes to recycle – and mechanisms involved in each – vary so much,” concluded McGeough.

 Like 丨  {{details_info.likes_count}}
Chemical raw material
Recycled plastic product
 Tangshan Zhonghao Chemical Co., Ltd      
 Guangdong Yilong Advanced Materials Technology Co Ltd      
 GUANGXI JINMAO TITANIUM CO.,LTD      
 SHANGHAI PUSUN PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD      
 JIANDE HUACHEN CHEMICAL CO.,LTD      
 Ningxia Baofeng Energy Group Co., Ltd.      
 SHANGHAI SMART NEW MATERIALS CO.,LTD      
 HANGZHOU JUHESHUN NEW MATERIAL CO., LTD.      
 JIANGSU YICAN SPECIAL PLASTICS CO., LTD.      
 SUZHOU ZHIFAN PLASTIC MATERIAL CO.,LTD      
 XIAMEN MEIJIAMEI NEW MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.      
 HEBEI LINGSHOU COUNTYZHONGKE MINERAL POWDERCO, LTD.      
 Henghe Material & Science Technology Co., Ltd      
 Rongsheng Petrochemical Co., Ltd.      
 FUJIAN HUASU INNOVATIVE PLASTICS MATERIALS CO., LTD.      
 Quanzhou Juyuan Plastic Machinery Co.,Ltd.      
 GUANGDONG BOSI SCI& TECH CO., LTD      
 ANHUI ISUOCHEM CO.,LTD      
 HUNAN PROVINCE SUN YOUNG NEW MATERIAL CO.,LTD.      
 JIANGSU LISIDE NEW MATERIAL CO., LTD      
 HEBEI TANGNAI TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD.      
 Guangdong Xinda Advanced Materials Technology Co., Ltd.      
 Hengyang Lihui Environmental friendly material Co. Ltd.      
 QINGDAO JABETTER NEW MATERIAL TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD.      
 QINGDAO HAIRUITE CHEMICAL MATERIAL CO., LTD      
 Taizhou Jianlong Technology Co.,Ltd      
 SHANDONG 123 PLASTIC MASTERBATCH CO., LTD      
 SHANXI GSQ NEW MATERIALS CO., LTD      
 Jiangsu Hanguang Industrial Co., Ltd.      
 SHANGHAI PUZHAN INDUSTRY CO., LTD.      
 SHENZHEN YUTIAN NEW MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD      
 HUANGSHAN GABOO NEW MATERIAL TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD      
 ZHEJIANG HONGYI CHEMICAL CO.,LTD.      
 ATK Flame Retardant Materials Company      
 SHENYANG SIWEI POLYMER PLASTIC CO., LTD.      
 ANHUI SHANHE NEW MATERIAL CO., LTD.,      
 CHITEC TECHNOLOGY (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD.      
 ANHUI SHAFENG ADVANCED MATERIAL CO., LTD.      
 YUNLIAN TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.      
 FUJIAN CHALLENGE WOLVES TECH. CO.,LTD      
 NINGBO YOUDAO CHEMICAL PLASTIC CO.,LTD      
 ZHANGJAGANG RONGSHENG MACHINERY CO.,LTD      
 SHINY MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY INC      
 Zhejiang Future Petrochemical Co.,ltd      
 BOOM INDUSTRY (SH) CO., LTD.      
 NANJING LEPUZ CHEMICAL CO., LTD.      
 WUXI HHC NEW MATERIAL CO., LTD.      
 XINJIANG XINGBOYU NEW MATERIAL CO., LTD.      
 HUNAN ZHONGJIN HUATAI TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD      
 SHANDONG LONGTUO NEW MATERIAL CO.,LTD      
 GUANGZHOU RONGFENG PLASTIC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.      
 AMOS COMPOSITES (GUANGDONG) CO., LTD      
 SOJITZ(SHANGHAI)CO.,LTD.      
 FLUOTECH (XIAMEN) NEW MATERIALS CO., LTD.      
 NINGBO JINGHAI PIGMENT CO., LTD      
 QINGDAO BANGKAI HI-TECH MATERIALS CO.,LTD.      
 VULCHEM MATERIAL SCIENCE (CHANGSHU) SO., LTD      
 JIAYU COUNTY YUWERNEW MATERIAL TECHNOLOGY CO..LTD      
 ENPING CITY RUIJI NEW MATERIAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.      
 HANGZHOU BRILLIANT CHEM TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD.      
 CHANGHE CHEMICAL NEW MATERIAL(JIANGSU) CO.,LTD.      
 HUNAN FARIDA TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD      
 LANGFANG HUABO ENVIRONMENT-PROTECTING MATERIAL CO.,LTD.      
 PENGLAI HONGWEI CHEMICAL CO., LTD.      
 SENNICS CO., LTD.      
 YINGKOU JINTONG NEW MATERIAL TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD      
 EPLASTMER NEW MATERIAL CO.,LTD      
 YONEI INNOVATIVE MATERIAL TECH LIMITED      
 Wudi Haoye Plastic Co. , Ltd.      
 DANDONG TIANCI FIRE-RETARDANT MATERIAL TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD.      
 JIANGSU CHEMK CO., LTD.      

The content you're trying to view is for members only. If you are currently a member, Please login to access this content.   Login

Source:Adsale Plastics Network Date :2023-04-13 Editor :Nigel Davis
Copyright: 原创,请勿转载

Plastics supply chain in Europe continues to push for greater legal certainty for recycled content, therefore, tracking of recycled content is a major issue, according to Nigel Davis, Insight Editor at ICIS.

 

There is obvious urgency behind the recent meeting of 31 trade associations for the EU to be clear on how it legally views chemical recycling and how recycled content is tracked in plastic products. It is the tracking of recycled content that is a major issue with industry pressing for the legal acknowledgement of a mass balance approach that excludes fuel use.

 

“Mass balance is a transparent and auditable method to trace a defined material characteristic along the value-chain from material suppliers to consumers,” the trade associations, which represent chemical producers, plastics converters, recyclers and end-use industries, claim.

 

“A mass balance chain of custody is already used and accepted in other domains such as sustainable forestry products and fair-trade cocoa and chocolate,” they said.

 

Essentially, this is push for policy support from the European Commission and EU member states for chemical recycling that could help speed investment and add more overall plastic recycling capability.

 

“The rules currently being developed for the Single-Use Plastics Directive (SUPD) implementing act will have a key impact on both mechanical and chemical recycling investments in Europe,” the associations said.


1_web.jpg

Tracking of recycled content is a major issue especially with the industry pressing for the legal acknowledgement of a mass balance approach that excludes fuel use.


The timelines for targets set out in frameworks such as the proposed Packaging and Packaging Waste directive, which set out goals for chemical recycling capacity by 2030 and 2040, will require the sector to begin work on commercial-scale production facilities immediately, according to the associations.

 

“It is therefore key that policymakers set a precedent as to when and how a mass balance chain of custody in recycled plastics will be applied in the EU sooner rather than later,” the trade groups said. “This precedent should also set the direction of policy in non-packaging sectors such as automotive or construction, where recycled plastics targets are currently under discussion or may arise in the future.”

 

There are clear concerns over the mass balance approach to approximating the recycled content of individual plastic items and customer acceptance is critical. If recycling capacity is to grow however, and the move towards greater plastics circularity accelerated, then clearer policy support is required.

 

The industry view is that the mass balance model can be based on credible third-party verification and certification. Chemicals trade group Cefic says that process losses and outputs, consumed as energy, should not count towards the recycled content targets.

 

“We need all up- and down-stream levers to be deployed, including both mechanical and chemical recycling, to create a circular plastics economy,” continued Virginia Janssens, Plastics Europe Managing Director, noting that chemical recycling is the only avenue for reusing certain kinds of plastic waste and to reach quality levels needed for some end markets.

 

“However, the complexity of the European plastics system, and long-investment cycles, mean investment decisions taken now will determine what the industry looks like in 2050,” she said.

 

Janssens added, “To accelerate the growth of chemical recycling, investors need the confidence provided by a full recognition of chemical recycling and acceptance of the mass balance model by EU policy makers. The window of opportunity to make investment decisions is rapidly closing.”

 

According to Helen McGeough, senior analyst for plastic recycling at ICIS, the open letter is the latest call from the recycling value chain for greater legal certainty from regulators.

 

“The chain is set to invest or seek investment to expand capabilities which will ultimately improve supply of recycled materials and move higher volumes of plastic waste away from the lower echelons of the waste hierarchy and requires this certainty to support those investment decisions,” she said.

 

“The supply chain wants and needs to have clarity on how to prove recycled content, for reporting purposes both legally required and expected from consumers,” she continued.

 

At present, the sector lacks a standardized approach, according to McGeough, with the commonly-used methodology behind mass balance remaining contentious.

 

“The open letter suggests the use of mass balance for recycling, but it remains unclear from the letter whether the mass balance approach is suggestion application not only to chemical recycling, but to mechanical recycling as well where it is generally not adopted in the same way,” she stated.

 

In mechanical recycling mass balance can also refer to the process of using a credit system to substitute the use of recycled material in one end-use for another in order to meet sustainability targets, according to McGeough.

 

“This can generate criticism for failing to fundamentally encourage tangible growth in recycling, increasing claims of greenwashing by the sector,” she said.

 

The concept of greenwashing is coming under increasing scrutiny in the EU, with regulators this week announcing a stronger push on eliminating the practice as deadlines to reach certain thresholds for recycling and carbon abatement draw closer.

 

At present, many of the systems for quantifying decarburization and waste-reduction remain fragmented, with McKinsey noting that the environmental, social and governance (ESG) space is currently similar to the state financial reporting was in a century ago.

 

Systems are likely to become more standardized over time, but the complexity of chemical – and even mechanical – makes the process a complex one, with few easy answers.

 

“Although harmonization in the recycling sector is needed in many areas, in terms of standardizing recycled content measurement this is challenging to resolve by a one size fits all approach for a complex industry, where the routes to recycle – and mechanisms involved in each – vary so much,” concluded McGeough.

全文内容需要订阅后才能阅读哦~
立即订阅

Leave Comment

Submit

All Comments

No Comment

{{VueShowUserOrCompany(itme.user)}}

{{ toolTimes(itme.updated_at,'s') }}

{{itme.body}}

Reply   
Submit
{{VueShowUserOrCompany(itmes.user)}} {{ toolTimes(itmes.updated_at,'s') }} Reply

{{itmes.body}}

Submit

Recommended Articles

Recycling
(CHINAPLAS Review) Onstage advanced technologies for chemical recycling
 2025-05-07
Recycling
Aduro and Siemens to deliver advanced automation for Hydrochemolytic pilot plant
 2025-05-07
Recycling
Clariant’s MegaMax 900 catalyst starts at European Energy’s e-methanol plant
 2025-04-28
Recycling
ENTEX: We are still at the beginning of the circular economy in many areas
 2025-04-28
Recycling
(Interview) Debut innovation from Nouryon transforms recycled plastic into high-quality materials
 2025-04-17
Recycling
Recycled Plastics Zone empowers businesses toward sustainability
 2025-04-16

You May Also Like

{{[item['category']['name'],item['category']['english_name']][lang]}}
{{VueShowUserOrCompany(item.author)}} {{VueShowDisplayName(item.author)}}
Sponsored
{{item.title}} {{item['summary']}}
{{itags.name}}
{{item.updated_at}}
 {{item.likes_count}}       {{item.comments_count}}

You May Be Interested In

Change

  • People
  • Company
loading... No Content
{{[item.truename,item.truename_english][lang]}} {{[item.company_name,item.company_name_english][lang]}} {{[item.job_name,item.name_english][lang]}}
{{[item.company_name,item.company_name_english][lang]}} Company Name    {{[item.display_name,item.display_name_english][lang]}}  

Polyurethane Investment Medical Carbon neutral Reduce cost and increase efficiency CHINAPLAS Financial reports rPET INEOS Styrolution Evonik Borouge Polystyrene (PS) mono-material Sustainability Circular economy BASF SABIC Multi-component injection molding machine All-electric injection molding machine Thermoforming machine

Plastics supply chain in Europe presses for legal certainty for recycled content

识别右侧二维码,进入阅读全文
下载
x 关闭
订阅
亲爱的用户,请填写一下信息
I have read and agree to the 《Terms of Use》 and 《Privacy Policy》
立即订阅
Top
Feedback
Chat
News
Market News
Applications
Products
Video
In Pictures
Specials
Activities
eBook
Front Line
Plastics Applications
Chemicals and Raw Material
Processing Technologies
Products
Injection
Extrusion
Auxiliary
Blow Molding
Mold
Hot Runner
Screw
Applications
Packaging
Automotive
Medical
Recycling
E&E
LED
Construction
Others
Events
Conference
Webinar
CHINAPLAS
CPS+ eMarketplace
Official Publications
CPS eNews
Media Kit
Social Media
Facebook
Youtube