Home
Search History
Clear History
{{item.search_key}}
Hot Searches
Change
{{item.name}}
{{item.english_name}}
Subscribe eNews
Once A Week Once Every Two Weeks
{{sum}}
{{sum}}
Login

Please Login

Subscribe To Tags, See What You Want To See

Sign Up For Events, Expand your network

Unlock Private Messages, Participate In Interactions

 Register

Hi.{{userInfo.company_name_english||userInfo.truename_english}} Hi.{{userInfo.truename||userInfo.phone||userInfo.email}}

Applications

R-Cycle unveils AI-based PPWR Compliance Compass at Interpack 2026

BASF expands compostable ecovio portfolio for flexible barrier packaging

Analysis for EU policy on bio-based plastic packaging under PPWR

Products

BASF expands HALS and NOR HALS capacities

Clariant launches new propane dehydrogenation catalyst

ENGEL to show integrated solutions for efficiency and precision at Interplas 2026

Activities

  • 350,000+ visitors! CHINAPLAS 2026 shatters every record in the book

  • CHINAPLAS 2026: 86,504 visitors explore innovations on Day 3

  • Must-attend events: Application in Focus and Additives Seminar

Pictorial

News Videos

Top 10 Technology Trends awards presented at CHINAPLAS 2026

MAAG x SIKORA: Smart pelletizing + precise inspection - More stable, carbon-reduced

CAI Machine: New visual inspection technology debut! More efficient, greener, colorful printing

Conference Videos

Interview: Thailand’s perspective on cross-border circular cooperation

Interview: On Indonesian recycling industry and rising geopolitical tensions

Interview: Vietnam’s progress in circular economy

Corporate/Product Videos

For Rubber & Plastic Extrusion Equipment, trust Hebei Zhongsen! Custom Extruders, Traction Machines & Vulcanizing Lines

Is Your Mold Supplier Really Giving You Peace of Mind?

Kurtz GmbH & Co.

News
NEW
HOT
 Events
NEW
HOT
 SPE Asia
NEW
HOT
 Special
NEW
HOT
 Live
NEW
HOT
 eNews
NEW
HOT
 Essential Guide
NEW
HOT
 Event Calendar
NEW
HOT
 Survey
NEW
HOT
 CHINA INSIGHT
NEW
HOT

Home > News > Market News

A new era in PET design? SACMI investigates the potential of PET caps

SACMI (SHANGHAI) MACHINERY EQUIPMENT CO., LTD.     Elite Member
Source：www.sacmi.com Date ：2025-07-17 Editor ：SACMI
Copyright： The content was uploaded and published by members of Adsale Plastics Network (AdsaleCPRJ.com). It represents the opinion of the author or the organization; Adsale Plastics Network provides the platform for information release only. For membership registration, please log in on a desktop computer:adsalecprj.com/shor/dMpPW0

Is it possible to produce a PET cap for beverage packaging at the current state of technological development? Should it replace HDPE (polyolefins), and under what conditions? Do the performance and functional characteristics align? But above all... Could this represent a genuine advantage in terms of total cost of ownership (TCO) and environmental sustainability?

SACMI addressed all these questions during its presentation on 20 May at the AMI – Plastic Closures Innovations conference in Malaga, Spain, with a speech entitled "A new era in PET design? SACMI's perspective on PET beverage caps".

 tappi.jpg 

The new 29 mm PET cap for water

SACMI unveiled a 29 mm PET water cap to the audience in Malaga. This standard was not selected at random — it's the most commonly used opening worldwide for this category of beverage.

The cap features segmented, hinged flaps at the base of the band for easier application; a segmented thread for simpler moulding and opening, reducing removal torque; and an olive plug to ensure a proper seal.

Produced on a CCM press with a cycle time of 2.7 seconds, the cap is fully transparent and performs comparably to an HDPE cap at room temperature. The subsequent processing stages, such as cutting and folding, also show good stability and repeatability at the experimental level.

 

PET cap and HDPE cap: advantages and disadvantages

The cap is a key component of the packaging, forming the first point of contact between the consumer and the product. The cap is responsible for the sealing and, consequently, the safety and freshness of the contents.

In terms of chemical and physical properties, polyolefins have proven particularly well-suited to this type of application. All beverage caps are currently made from polyolefins — primarily HDPE — which is highly efficient from both an economic and environmental perspective. In fact, over the past two decades, the main drivers have been reducing virgin resin consumption (with a reduction of more than 50% in total weight between cap and relative opening) and energy use. More recently, the cap2cap recycling chain has begun to emerge on some markets.

From a recycling standpoint, separating HDPE (used for caps) from PET (used for bottles) is relatively straightforward and cost-effective: by grinding the materials, HDPE floats away from PET, enabling the recovery and reuse of both materials.

In terms of production, it should be noted that PET may require a cycle time over 70% longer than HDPE, and — under the same conditions — the cap may be heavier than its polyolefin counterpart.

So, why switch to PET? This would create mono-material packaging, thereby increasing the PET yield during the recycling process. In addition, PET caps are transparent, offering a more aesthetically pleasing appearance.

 

Performance, technological and process challenges

SACMI’s project centres on the chemical and physical properties of PET, cap performance, and the economic and environmental impact of the same.

Compared to HDPE, PET presents some significant challenges: chief among them are its amorphous structure and hygroscopic nature, which together cause the material to deform under stress (despite PET’s theoretically superior mechanical properties).

A detailed comparison of the two materials helps define the "process window", highlight relative differences, and assess cost implications.

PET has a density approximately 40% higher than HDPE;

The processing temperature for PET exceeds 270 °C, significantly greater than that of HDPE (<200 °C);

PET crystallises much more slowly than HDPE, and its glass transition temperature is very close to the cap’s operating temperature.

 

Impact on TCO and life cycle assessment

The higher melting point of PET compared to HDPE inevitably demands more energy to melt and subsequently cool the material to a demoulding temperature.

PET cap production requires a cycle time up to 70% longer than that of HDPE caps (due to higher processing temperatures, slower crystallisation, and lower thermal diffusivity), and it also requires dedicated moulds because of differing material properties (such as shrinkage and elastic modulus).

Performance is similar to that of HDPE caps, with two important considerations:

PET is highly sensitive to elevated temperatures, which must be factored into the logistics and storage of the finished product;

For equivalent performance, a PET cap weighs around 20% more than an HDPE cap — its theoretical strength is offset by high moisture absorption, which, according to tests, can reduce its mechanical properties by up to 60%. Efforts to reduce wall thickness (e.g. approximately 0.4 mm in HDPE caps) face technological constraints during moulding, such as mechanical tolerances, stress-induced crystallisation, etc.

Sacmi's approach included a highly detailed LCA analysis, carried out by an independent laboratory. The results of the analysis, covering 19 parameters (including climate change, resource use, water, soil, etc.) in accordance with the international standards, underscored the importance of conducting such evaluations before launching the project to confirm tangible environmental benefits.

The regulatory context must also be considered. On the one hand, the European PPWR (Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation) promotes the adoption of mono-material, returnable, and similar packaging solutions, supporting this development in principle. On the other hand, it pushes for an overall reduction in packaging weight, a target not yet attainable with the PET alternative.

 

The SACMI approach

The design and development of the new PET cap comply with the international standards regarding cap performance requirements. In addition, SACMI’s process avoids the use of additives and dyes that could interfere with subsequent recycling: the PET used is standard PET or rPET suitable for bottles.

With regard to cap production and application technologies, SACMI deliberately avoided introducing special capping equipment, testing the production on its own CCM (continuous compression moulding) presses. In-line cutting and folding were also adopted, along with integrated quality control.

The entire process was tested on a pilot line consisting of a humidification unit, extruder, adapted compression moulding unit, cutting and folding line, and quality control using CVS systems.

 

Technology: the support of the SACMI Lab

Reduced cycle times and high cavitation are key market demands that SACMI has addressed with the recent launch of the new CCM64MD press. Boasting outstanding performance, the machine can produce up to 2,850 caps per minute (171,000 caps per hour) in HDPE, using just 64 moulds and a cycle time of only 1.35 seconds. This is achieved alongside a 50% reduction in footprint and a 15% reduction in specific energy consumption compared to the previous generation, at 0.43 kWh per kilogram of HDPE processed.

In this context, any potential shift from HDPE to PET would require consideration of several factors: comparable performance (especially regarding storage temperatures, transportation, etc.), higher TCO, LCA assessments tailored to specific environmental and production scenarios, etc. The SACMI Laboratory is available to support customers in developing customised early adoption solutions.


 Like 丨  {{details_info.likes_count}}
Sacmi
 SACMI (SHANGHAI) MACHINERY EQUIPMENT CO., LTD.      

The content you're trying to view is for members only. If you are currently a member, Please login to access this content.   Login

SACMI (SHANGHAI) MACHINERY EQUIPMENT CO., LTD.     Elite Member
Source：www.sacmi.com Date ：2025-07-17 Editor ：SACMI
Copyright： The content was uploaded and published by members of Adsale Plastics Network (AdsaleCPRJ.com). It represents the opinion of the author or the organization; Adsale Plastics Network provides the platform for information release only. For membership registration, please log in on a desktop computer:adsalecprj.com/shor/dMpPW0

Is it possible to produce a PET cap for beverage packaging at the current state of technological development? Should it replace HDPE (polyolefins), and under what conditions? Do the performance and functional characteristics align? But above all... Could this represent a genuine advantage in terms of total cost of ownership (TCO) and environmental sustainability?

SACMI addressed all these questions during its presentation on 20 May at the AMI – Plastic Closures Innovations conference in Malaga, Spain, with a speech entitled "A new era in PET design? SACMI's perspective on PET beverage caps".

 tappi.jpg 

The new 29 mm PET cap for water

SACMI unveiled a 29 mm PET water cap to the audience in Malaga. This standard was not selected at random — it's the most commonly used opening worldwide for this category of beverage.

The cap features segmented, hinged flaps at the base of the band for easier application; a segmented thread for simpler moulding and opening, reducing removal torque; and an olive plug to ensure a proper seal.

Produced on a CCM press with a cycle time of 2.7 seconds, the cap is fully transparent and performs comparably to an HDPE cap at room temperature. The subsequent processing stages, such as cutting and folding, also show good stability and repeatability at the experimental level.

 

PET cap and HDPE cap: advantages and disadvantages

The cap is a key component of the packaging, forming the first point of contact between the consumer and the product. The cap is responsible for the sealing and, consequently, the safety and freshness of the contents.

In terms of chemical and physical properties, polyolefins have proven particularly well-suited to this type of application. All beverage caps are currently made from polyolefins — primarily HDPE — which is highly efficient from both an economic and environmental perspective. In fact, over the past two decades, the main drivers have been reducing virgin resin consumption (with a reduction of more than 50% in total weight between cap and relative opening) and energy use. More recently, the cap2cap recycling chain has begun to emerge on some markets.

From a recycling standpoint, separating HDPE (used for caps) from PET (used for bottles) is relatively straightforward and cost-effective: by grinding the materials, HDPE floats away from PET, enabling the recovery and reuse of both materials.

In terms of production, it should be noted that PET may require a cycle time over 70% longer than HDPE, and — under the same conditions — the cap may be heavier than its polyolefin counterpart.

So, why switch to PET? This would create mono-material packaging, thereby increasing the PET yield during the recycling process. In addition, PET caps are transparent, offering a more aesthetically pleasing appearance.

 

Performance, technological and process challenges

SACMI’s project centres on the chemical and physical properties of PET, cap performance, and the economic and environmental impact of the same.

Compared to HDPE, PET presents some significant challenges: chief among them are its amorphous structure and hygroscopic nature, which together cause the material to deform under stress (despite PET’s theoretically superior mechanical properties).

A detailed comparison of the two materials helps define the "process window", highlight relative differences, and assess cost implications.

PET has a density approximately 40% higher than HDPE;

The processing temperature for PET exceeds 270 °C, significantly greater than that of HDPE (<200 °C);

PET crystallises much more slowly than HDPE, and its glass transition temperature is very close to the cap’s operating temperature.

 

Impact on TCO and life cycle assessment

The higher melting point of PET compared to HDPE inevitably demands more energy to melt and subsequently cool the material to a demoulding temperature.

PET cap production requires a cycle time up to 70% longer than that of HDPE caps (due to higher processing temperatures, slower crystallisation, and lower thermal diffusivity), and it also requires dedicated moulds because of differing material properties (such as shrinkage and elastic modulus).

Performance is similar to that of HDPE caps, with two important considerations:

PET is highly sensitive to elevated temperatures, which must be factored into the logistics and storage of the finished product;

For equivalent performance, a PET cap weighs around 20% more than an HDPE cap — its theoretical strength is offset by high moisture absorption, which, according to tests, can reduce its mechanical properties by up to 60%. Efforts to reduce wall thickness (e.g. approximately 0.4 mm in HDPE caps) face technological constraints during moulding, such as mechanical tolerances, stress-induced crystallisation, etc.

Sacmi's approach included a highly detailed LCA analysis, carried out by an independent laboratory. The results of the analysis, covering 19 parameters (including climate change, resource use, water, soil, etc.) in accordance with the international standards, underscored the importance of conducting such evaluations before launching the project to confirm tangible environmental benefits.

The regulatory context must also be considered. On the one hand, the European PPWR (Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation) promotes the adoption of mono-material, returnable, and similar packaging solutions, supporting this development in principle. On the other hand, it pushes for an overall reduction in packaging weight, a target not yet attainable with the PET alternative.

 

The SACMI approach

The design and development of the new PET cap comply with the international standards regarding cap performance requirements. In addition, SACMI’s process avoids the use of additives and dyes that could interfere with subsequent recycling: the PET used is standard PET or rPET suitable for bottles.

With regard to cap production and application technologies, SACMI deliberately avoided introducing special capping equipment, testing the production on its own CCM (continuous compression moulding) presses. In-line cutting and folding were also adopted, along with integrated quality control.

The entire process was tested on a pilot line consisting of a humidification unit, extruder, adapted compression moulding unit, cutting and folding line, and quality control using CVS systems.

 

Technology: the support of the SACMI Lab

Reduced cycle times and high cavitation are key market demands that SACMI has addressed with the recent launch of the new CCM64MD press. Boasting outstanding performance, the machine can produce up to 2,850 caps per minute (171,000 caps per hour) in HDPE, using just 64 moulds and a cycle time of only 1.35 seconds. This is achieved alongside a 50% reduction in footprint and a 15% reduction in specific energy consumption compared to the previous generation, at 0.43 kWh per kilogram of HDPE processed.

In this context, any potential shift from HDPE to PET would require consideration of several factors: comparable performance (especially regarding storage temperatures, transportation, etc.), higher TCO, LCA assessments tailored to specific environmental and production scenarios, etc. The SACMI Laboratory is available to support customers in developing customised early adoption solutions.


全文内容需要订阅后才能阅读哦~
立即订阅
FUJIAN HONGKONG PETROCHEMICAL LIMITED KOKSAN CHINA POLYESTER CHIPS
JIANGSU XINFLON PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO.,LTD OQ MARKETING LLC LINKER NEW MATERIALS CO., LTD

Recommended Articles

Corporate News
Next Generation Group appoints new Managing Director
 2026-05-08
Corporate News
Chemetall opens new application laboratory in Vietnam
 2026-05-08
Corporate News
Barnes Molding Solutions becomes SPECTRIX
 2026-05-08
Corporate News
ENGEL reports revenue drop of 6%
 2026-05-07
Corporate News
Gneuss MC becomes independent company for sensors and measurement technology
 2026-05-06
Corporate News
Lone Star acquires polymers businesses of RadiciGroup and DOMO
 2026-05-05
MAAG Bannner Ad (EN) WENZHOU CHAOXU MACHINERY CO.，LTD.
7/5000 Packaging and palletizing production line Cooling roll FCS button ad EN
  • Must See
    • News
    Images
    Watch it
1
CHINAPLAS 2026：VDMA “The Power of Plastics” forum highlights digitalization and circularity
2
ENGEL’s high-performance automotive solutions at CHINAPLAS 2026
3
As global PFAS regulations tighten, how should the food packaging industry respond?
4
Building a robust industrial ecosystem in Malaysia for high quality production
5
Evonik to display innovations for Chinese emerging markets at CHINAPLAS 2026
1
Arkema: High performance bio circular material for sustainable future
2
About Dow
3
[Mandarin session: Highlights] Covestro: Innovative thermal conductive material solution for new-generation network devices
4
JCTIMES: When dies start "self-learning", is there any need for labor in production line?
5
Wanhua Chemical: New material solutions for high-end manufacturing and green development
  • Hot Specials

You May Be Interested In

Change
  • People
  • Company
loading... No Content
{{[item.truename,item.truename_english][lang]}} {{[item.company_name,item.company_name_english][lang]}} {{[item.job_name,item.name_english][lang]}}
{{[item.company_name,item.company_name_english][lang]}} Company Name    {{[item.display_name,item.display_name_english][lang]}}  

Polyurethane Investment Medical Carbon neutral Reduce cost and increase efficiency CHINAPLAS Financial reports rPET INEOS Styrolution Evonik Borouge Polystyrene (PS) mono-material Sustainability Circular economy BASF SABIC Multi-component injection molding machine All-electric injection molding machine Thermoforming machine

A new era in PET design? SACMI investigates the potential of PET caps

识别右侧二维码，进入阅读全文
下载
x 关闭
订阅
亲爱的用户，请填写一下信息
I have read and agree to the 《Terms of Use》 and 《Privacy Policy》
立即订阅
Top
Feedback
Chat
News
Market News
Applications
Products
Video
In Pictures
Specials
Activities
eBook
Front Line
Plastics Applications
Chemicals and Raw Material
Processing Technologies
Products
Injection
Extrusion
Auxiliary
Blow Molding
Mold
Hot Runner
Screw
Applications
Packaging
Automotive
Medical
Recycling
E&E
LED
Construction
Others
Events
Conference
Webinar
CHINAPLAS
CPS+ eMarketplace
Official Publications
CPS eNews
Media Kit
Social Media
Facebook
Linkedin
Adsale Group ｜  About Us ｜  Terms of Use ｜  Privacy Policy ｜  Contact Us ｜  Media Kit ｜  Consent Letter for Processing Personal Data ｜