Log in
onclick="gourl('https://www.adsalecprj.com/en/auth/register.html')" v-if="!userInfo.id"> Register
Contact
{{userInfo.company_name_english||userInfo.truename_english}}
{{userInfo.phone||userInfo.email}}

Home Page

Member Center

Data Settings

Log out

 
Market News

Mind the sustainability gap: What the new EcoVadis report means for global exporters

Aug 14, 2026

Global supply chain sustainability remains severely constrained by data blind spots, missing risk frameworks, and limited scope 3 reporting, according to the tenth edition of the Sustainability Ratings Index from global sustainability rating leader, EcoVadis.


Analyzing nearly 200,000 scorecards from more than 100,000 companies globally between 2021 and 2025, the report reveals a stark structural deficit: four out of five assessed companies still lack a documented process for identifying or managing supply chain sustainability risks.


This underscores a widening divide across international trade—while suppliers advance operational carbon improvements, buyer organizations remain unable to exercise verifiable procurement oversight.


ECOVADIS_report_600.jpg

The tenth edition of the Sustainability Ratings Index. (Source: EcoVadis)


Supply chain bottlenecks: Scope 3 disclosures and AI constraints


Despite rising corporate investment in ESG initiatives, critical reporting gaps persist across global value chains:


Scope 3 reporting deficit: 73% of rated companies fail to report upstream Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions, 77% do not track downstream emissions, and 78% lack science-based emission reduction targets under the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi).


Restricted data flow: Fewer than 1% of suppliers share detailed sustainability metrics directly with buyers, crippling cross-supply-chain transparency.


Limits of procurement AI: Although 68% of corporate buyers deploy AI in procurement programs, technology cannot fix underlying data scarcity: 30% of suppliers submit zero carbon emissions data, while 26% provide only aggregated Scope 1&2 figures.


“Better software does not close that gap,” said Sylvain Guyoton, Chief Rating Officer at EcoVadis. “The measurement problem lives in the supply base itself, and closing it requires sustained engagement over time: structured assessment, scored performance and documented follow-through.”


ECOVADIS_scope 3_600.jpg

The report finds 30% of suppliers submit no carbon emissions data, and 26% share only aggregated Scope 1 and 2 figures. (Source: EcoVadis)


Renewable energy progress vs. lagging procurement frameworks


While operational action on renewable energy is advancing, strategic procurement management continues to fall behind:


Operational action: 46% of rated suppliers now purchase or generate      renewable energy, 38% train staff on climate action, and 32% conduct      formal energy or carbon audits.


Underdeveloped management: Sustainable procurement remains the most underdeveloped area globally, with only 19% of rated companies achieving "Advanced+" status. Corporate oversight remains heavily document-led, with 46% relying on supplier codes of conduct and 42% using evaluation questionnaires.


Regional dynamics: European leadership, Asian acceleration, and U.S. realignment


Across global markets, sustainability performance and participation trends show distinct regional patterns:


Europe leads in scale and maturity: Representing 57% of all 2025 assessments, Europe outpaces global average with a 61.2 score. France (6,000+) and Germany (5,400+) drive volume, with ~75% repeat ratings reflecting highly mature programs.


· China's rapid progression: China’s average score reached 50.4 in 2025 (+12.2 points since 2021), with "Advanced+" performers jumping from 0% to 21%. First-time entrants comprised 42% of its 5,100+ assessment pool.


· South Korea's sharp acceleration: South Korea recorded the platform's fastest growth, surging 56% year-on-year to 860+ ratings. Nearly half (48%) were first-time participants.


· U.S. volume high, SME participation softens: The U.S. remains the third-largest country (5,200+ scorecards), but overall ratings dipped ~2% due to eroding SME engagement. Conversely, Canadian assessments grew 3% to 600+.


65+ score_600.jpg

Percentage of rated companies scoring 65+ by country in 2025. (Source: EcoVadis)


Outlook for global exporters


As international reporting regulations expand, consumer goods producers, manufacturers, and packaging companies face mounting pressure from investors and regulators alike. Moving beyond basic policy documentation toward transparent, audit-ready carbon tracking and verifiable risk management is no longer optional—it is rapidly becoming a prerequisite for competing in global trade.


Get the full report: https://ecovadis.com/insights/index-2026/

 


Carbon neutral
Sustainability
Comments
Packaging
The conference was successfully held at Shanghai, China. According to the organizers, the event drew an attendance of over 750 participants.
Aug 6, 2026
Corporate News
BASF’s engineering plastics plant in Minhang, Shanghai, and at the Zhanjiang Verbund site in Guangdong Province have been certified under ISCC PLUS (International Sustainability and Carbon Certification).
Jul 23, 2026
Recycling
A research team at Ewha Womans University has developed a new technology to convert mixed waste plastics into high-purity hydrogen, addressing both waste-plastic treatment and clean-energy production.
Jul 9, 2026
Recycling
Reaching four years ahead of schedule, this achievement highlights how strongly sustainability has become part of AkzoNobel’s day-to-day business.
Jul 7, 2026
Packaging
UNITED CAPS has published its first Group Sustainability Report, covering its sustainability approach, performance, governance framework and key priorities across its operations in Europe and Asia.
Jun 29, 2026
Recycling
TotalEnergies Corbion has published its first Sustainability Report, setting a new benchmark for transparency, accountability, and measurable sustainability performance in the company and the bioplastics industry.
Jun 29, 2026
Share Your Choice
Facebook
X
Email